Hospital Furniture. Orthopedic Implants. Medical Disposables. Diagnostic Equipments. Anaesthesia Equipments. Laboratory Products. Medical Rubber Products. Hospital Holloware. Infant Care Equipments. Laryngoscope Set. Cold Chain Equipments. Mouse over to Zoom - Click to enlarge. Have one to sell? Sell now - Have one to sell? Shop with confidence. Get the item you ordered or get your money back. Learn more - eBay Money Back Guarantee - opens in a new window or tab.
Seller information. Contact seller Contact seller. Visit store Visit store. See other items See other items. Item Information Condition:. Sign in to check out Check out as guest. The item you've selected was not added to your cart. Best Offer:. Make Offer. Add to Watchlist Unwatch. Watch list is full. Fast and safe shipping.
This amount is subject to change until you make payment. For additional information, see the Global Shipping Program terms and conditions - opens in a new window or tab. Located in:. Words cannot describe how good those speakers are!
You are welcome t. Sonos play 3 speaker. Very good condition except small dent on the corner. Adverts older than today 5 images. Sony Hifi sound system mini micro system Newham, London. Powerful 6. Cinema Marquee Distance from search location: 14 miles Croydon, London. Soundbar and subwoofer Distance from search location: 9 miles Dartford, Kent. Home cinema Thompson Distance from search location: 16 miles Ealing, London. JBL 2.
On 15 November , the Chair of the panel informed the DSB that in light of the complexity of this dispute, the panel expected to issue its final report in the first half of The Chair noted that the report would be available to the public once it was circulated to the Members in all three official languages, and that the date of circulation depended on completion of translation. On 24 August , the panel report was circulated to Members. This dispute relates to countervailing measures imposed by the United States on softwood lumber from Canada.
Canada claimed that the USDOC improperly rejected prices of stumpage from certain regions in Canada proposed by Canadian interested parties to the USDOC as benchmarks for determining the adequacy of remuneration for provision of standing timber by Canadian provinces subject to the investigation. Considering that Canada did not properly make out that claim, the Panel found that it had no basis, and declined, to rule on Canada's claim under Article 14 d that the USDOC improperly rejected the proposed stumpage benchmark in New Brunswick to determine the adequacy of remuneration for Crown timber provided to the respondent companies by that province.
The Panel upheld Canada's claim under the chapeau of Article 14 of the SCM Agreement as it found that an objective and unbiased investigating authority would not have relied on the Nova Scotia survey for determining the benchmark price.
The Panel exercised judicial economy in respect of Canada's claims under Article Canada claimed that the USDOC acted inconsistently with Article 14 d of the SCM Agreement in selecting an out-of-country benchmark based on Washington log prices to assess the adequacy of remuneration for standing timber provided by British Columbia to Canadian producers.
0コメント